<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (12) TMI 880 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447196</link>
    <description>ITAT Delhi ruled in favor of the assessee regarding bogus purchases allegations. The tribunal found that a protective addition of 5% and alleged commission/brokerage as business income were not sustainable. The decision was based on a previous ITAT Delhi ruling in Orient Craft Ltd. case, which established that purchases from the assessee were genuine. Consequently, both the protective addition and the CIT(A)&#039;s order adding alleged commission/brokerage as business income were set aside for all assessment years under consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2023 11:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=735797" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (12) TMI 880 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447196</link>
      <description>ITAT Delhi ruled in favor of the assessee regarding bogus purchases allegations. The tribunal found that a protective addition of 5% and alleged commission/brokerage as business income were not sustainable. The decision was based on a previous ITAT Delhi ruling in Orient Craft Ltd. case, which established that purchases from the assessee were genuine. Consequently, both the protective addition and the CIT(A)&#039;s order adding alleged commission/brokerage as business income were set aside for all assessment years under consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447196</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>