<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (11) TMI 11 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34969</link>
    <description>The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed as the Division Bench upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the treatment of overdue charges. The Court emphasized that recognizing income from overdue charges was challenging as they were contingent on parties defaulting on payments. The change in the accounting method to a cash basis was deemed permissible and did not result in tax evasion. Therefore, the Division Bench affirmed that the assessee&#039;s method of accounting for overdue charges was justified, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 10:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73578" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (11) TMI 11 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34969</link>
      <description>The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed as the Division Bench upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the treatment of overdue charges. The Court emphasized that recognizing income from overdue charges was challenging as they were contingent on parties defaulting on payments. The change in the accounting method to a cash basis was deemed permissible and did not result in tax evasion. Therefore, the Division Bench affirmed that the assessee&#039;s method of accounting for overdue charges was justified, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34969</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>