<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (12) TMI 853 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447169</link>
    <description>CESTAT Chennai held that IIT Madras was not liable for service tax on sponsored research projects as these constituted grants for educational purposes rather than taxable services under Scientific and Technical Consultancy Services. However, service tax demand on convention services was upheld as the institution provided commercial convention facilities to external parties for consideration. The tribunal allowed CENVAT credit on travel and postal expenses as legitimate input services for consultancy activities. Extended limitation period was rejected due to absence of suppression, and penalties were set aside. Appeal was partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2023 09:36:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=735761" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (12) TMI 853 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447169</link>
      <description>CESTAT Chennai held that IIT Madras was not liable for service tax on sponsored research projects as these constituted grants for educational purposes rather than taxable services under Scientific and Technical Consultancy Services. However, service tax demand on convention services was upheld as the institution provided commercial convention facilities to external parties for consideration. The tribunal allowed CENVAT credit on travel and postal expenses as legitimate input services for consultancy activities. Extended limitation period was rejected due to absence of suppression, and penalties were set aside. Appeal was partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447169</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>