https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34966 The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner's order demanding Rs.5,69,45,194 along with penalties from the appellant for alleged non-rendering of Consulting Engineer Service separately. The Tribunal found the issue inadequately addressed and ordered fresh consideration. Similarly, the Tribunal directed a reevaluation of the appellant's eligibility for input credit under Notification No.1/06-ST, emphasizing the need for a thorough review of submissions. The Tribunal criticized the Commissioner's order for being cryptic and not addressing all issues adequately, remanding the matter for further consideration with a 45-day window for additional submissions and evidence. en-us Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 May 2010 18:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34966 The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner's order demanding Rs.5,69,45,194 along with penalties from the appellant for alleged non-rendering of Consulting Engineer Service separately. The Tribunal found the issue inadequately addressed and ordered fresh consideration. Similarly, the Tribunal directed a reevaluation of the appellant's eligibility for input credit under Notification No.1/06-ST, emphasizing the need for a thorough review of submissions. The Tribunal criticized the Commissioner's order for being cryptic and not addressing all issues adequately, remanding the matter for further consideration with a 45-day window for additional submissions and evidence. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34966