<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (12) TMI 836 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447152</link>
    <description>The statutory period for depositing the minimum amount in an appeal against conviction under the Negotiable Instruments Act was treated as mandatory, with only the limited extension expressly provided by the statute. The provision was read purposively to deter delay in cheque dishonour proceedings and secure prompt payment to the complainant. Inherent jurisdiction under the Code of Criminal Procedure cannot be used to override an express statutory ceiling or create a further extension beyond the maximum period contemplated by law. Accordingly, the text affirms that the deposit deadline cannot be enlarged past 90 days through inherent powers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2023 17:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=735739" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (12) TMI 836 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447152</link>
      <description>The statutory period for depositing the minimum amount in an appeal against conviction under the Negotiable Instruments Act was treated as mandatory, with only the limited extension expressly provided by the statute. The provision was read purposively to deter delay in cheque dishonour proceedings and secure prompt payment to the complainant. Inherent jurisdiction under the Code of Criminal Procedure cannot be used to override an express statutory ceiling or create a further extension beyond the maximum period contemplated by law. Accordingly, the text affirms that the deposit deadline cannot be enlarged past 90 days through inherent powers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447152</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>