<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 1329 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311320</link>
    <description>A writ petition challenging an order under the Karnataka GST, CGST and IGST regime was disposed of without adjudication on merits because a statutory appellate remedy under Section 107 of the Karnataka GST Act was available. The Court left the petitioner free to pursue that alternative remedy and granted express liberty to seek exclusion of the time spent in prosecuting the writ petition before the statutory forum.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2023 06:31:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=735737" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 1329 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311320</link>
      <description>A writ petition challenging an order under the Karnataka GST, CGST and IGST regime was disposed of without adjudication on merits because a statutory appellate remedy under Section 107 of the Karnataka GST Act was available. The Court left the petitioner free to pursue that alternative remedy and granted express liberty to seek exclusion of the time spent in prosecuting the writ petition before the statutory forum.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311320</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>