<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 1742 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311307</link>
    <description>The CESTAT Kolkata held that the Appellant, a security service provider, was liable to pay service tax for the normal period of limitation on services provided to Government agencies. However, the extended period for demanding service tax was deemed inapplicable as the Appellant did not suppress information. Consequently, the demands confirmed in the impugned order were not sustainable. The Appellant was directed to pay any service tax due, along with interest, for the normal period, without any penalty. The appeal was disposed of on 19.12.2023.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2023 14:44:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=735709" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 1742 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311307</link>
      <description>The CESTAT Kolkata held that the Appellant, a security service provider, was liable to pay service tax for the normal period of limitation on services provided to Government agencies. However, the extended period for demanding service tax was deemed inapplicable as the Appellant did not suppress information. Consequently, the demands confirmed in the impugned order were not sustainable. The Appellant was directed to pay any service tax due, along with interest, for the normal period, without any penalty. The appeal was disposed of on 19.12.2023.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311307</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>