<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 117 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34957</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee in a case concerning compliance with the Income-tax Act, 1961, specifically focusing on section 44AB and penalty under section 271B. The Court upheld the cancellation of the penalty by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) and the Tribunal, emphasizing that the audit report was obtained within the required timeframe and self-assessment tax was paid before filing the return. The decision highlighted the importance of following relevant circulars and provisions of the Act, setting a precedent for cases involving penalties under section 271B and the timely fulfillment of audit and tax payment obligations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73566" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 117 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34957</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee in a case concerning compliance with the Income-tax Act, 1961, specifically focusing on section 44AB and penalty under section 271B. The Court upheld the cancellation of the penalty by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) and the Tribunal, emphasizing that the audit report was obtained within the required timeframe and self-assessment tax was paid before filing the return. The decision highlighted the importance of following relevant circulars and provisions of the Act, setting a precedent for cases involving penalties under section 271B and the timely fulfillment of audit and tax payment obligations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34957</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>