<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (12) TMI 807 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447123</link>
    <description>ITAT Ahmedabad allowed assessee&#039;s appeal against CIT&#039;s revision order u/s 263. CIT sought to revise AO&#039;s assessment accepting political party donation deduction u/s 80GG, claiming inadequate inquiry. ITAT held inadequate inquiry cannot make AO&#039;s order erroneous unless law is wrongly applied. AO had made inquiries and accepted donation genuineness based on available material. Search revealing political party&#039;s donation scam occurred after assessment, so AO couldn&#039;t consider those findings. ITAT distinguished between lack of inquiry and inadequate inquiry, ruling AO&#039;s order wasn&#039;t erroneous or prejudicial to revenue interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2023 09:01:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=735659" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (12) TMI 807 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447123</link>
      <description>ITAT Ahmedabad allowed assessee&#039;s appeal against CIT&#039;s revision order u/s 263. CIT sought to revise AO&#039;s assessment accepting political party donation deduction u/s 80GG, claiming inadequate inquiry. ITAT held inadequate inquiry cannot make AO&#039;s order erroneous unless law is wrongly applied. AO had made inquiries and accepted donation genuineness based on available material. Search revealing political party&#039;s donation scam occurred after assessment, so AO couldn&#039;t consider those findings. ITAT distinguished between lack of inquiry and inadequate inquiry, ruling AO&#039;s order wasn&#039;t erroneous or prejudicial to revenue interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447123</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>