https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447106 Transfer documentation and statutory company records showed the share transfer had been completed after board approval, with the defendant recorded as shareholder. Under the Sale of Goods Act, mere non-payment or postponement of price did not prevent title from passing where specific goods were transferred in a deliverable state without reservation of disposal. Once transfer was complete, the seller's remedies lay as an unpaid seller for price or damages, not in retaining title or seeking to restrain dealings with the shares. The plaintiff's earlier inconsistent pleadings also weakened the request for interim relief, and the injunction application was rejected. en-us Fri, 15 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 19 Dec 2023 09:00:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447106 Transfer documentation and statutory company records showed the share transfer had been completed after board approval, with the defendant recorded as shareholder. Under the Sale of Goods Act, mere non-payment or postponement of price did not prevent title from passing where specific goods were transferred in a deliverable state without reservation of disposal. Once transfer was complete, the seller's remedies lay as an unpaid seller for price or damages, not in retaining title or seeking to restrain dealings with the shares. The plaintiff's earlier inconsistent pleadings also weakened the request for interim relief, and the injunction application was rejected. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 15 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447106