<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 1340 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311304</link>
    <description>In a PMLA bail application under Section 439 CrPC, the Court held that the investigation material showed a prima facie nexus through search-and-seizure records, diaries, digital devices, cash entries and property transactions, indicating concealment, possession, acquisition and projection of proceeds of crime under Sections 2(1)(u) and 3. It further held that the woman-related exception in Section 45(1) does not confer an automatic right to bail, and that the gravity of the alleged economic offence, possible misuse of official influence, and risk to witnesses and evidence justified refusal of release at that stage. Bail was refused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2023 06:39:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=735618" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 1340 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311304</link>
      <description>In a PMLA bail application under Section 439 CrPC, the Court held that the investigation material showed a prima facie nexus through search-and-seizure records, diaries, digital devices, cash entries and property transactions, indicating concealment, possession, acquisition and projection of proceeds of crime under Sections 2(1)(u) and 3. It further held that the woman-related exception in Section 45(1) does not confer an automatic right to bail, and that the gravity of the alleged economic offence, possible misuse of official influence, and risk to witnesses and evidence justified refusal of release at that stage. Bail was refused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311304</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>