<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 1491 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311298</link>
    <description>Gujarat HC dismissed appeal in dishonour of cheque case under NI Act. Court held that accused successfully rebutted statutory presumption under Sections 118(a) and 139 by showing preponderance of probabilities. Complainant failed to prove cheque was drawn towards legally enforceable debt and could not establish ownership of land or 30% share claimed. Sessions Judge correctly acquitted accused after meticulously considering evidence. HC found no manifest error of law requiring interference with trial court&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2023 06:39:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=735612" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 1491 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311298</link>
      <description>Gujarat HC dismissed appeal in dishonour of cheque case under NI Act. Court held that accused successfully rebutted statutory presumption under Sections 118(a) and 139 by showing preponderance of probabilities. Complainant failed to prove cheque was drawn towards legally enforceable debt and could not establish ownership of land or 30% share claimed. Sessions Judge correctly acquitted accused after meticulously considering evidence. HC found no manifest error of law requiring interference with trial court&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311298</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>