https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447068 A civil suit challenging an assignment deed was found not maintainable in Delhi because no part of the cause of action arose there: the deed was executed outside Delhi, and mere knowledge of it did not create territorial jurisdiction under Section 20(c) CPC. The suit was also barred by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, as the dispute was connected with an ongoing corporate insolvency resolution process and fell within the exclusive domain of the insolvency adjudicatory mechanism under Sections 60, 63 and 231. The plaint was returned for presentation before the competent forum. en-us Fri, 15 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Jan 2026 18:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447068 A civil suit challenging an assignment deed was found not maintainable in Delhi because no part of the cause of action arose there: the deed was executed outside Delhi, and mere knowledge of it did not create territorial jurisdiction under Section 20(c) CPC. The suit was also barred by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, as the dispute was connected with an ongoing corporate insolvency resolution process and fell within the exclusive domain of the insolvency adjudicatory mechanism under Sections 60, 63 and 231. The plaint was returned for presentation before the competent forum. Case-Laws IBC Fri, 15 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447068