https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447066 The CESTAT Hyderabad ruled that the appellant is not liable for service tax on the construction of residential flats for the period before July 1, 2010, based on Circular No.151/2/2010-ST. For the period after July 1, 2010, the Tribunal determined that the service tax was incorrectly demanded under "Construction of residential complex service" and should have been classified under "Works Contract service." The Tribunal allowed the appeal, set aside the Impugned Order, and granted the appellant consequential benefits according to the law. en-us Wed, 29 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Dec 2023 09:06:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447066 The CESTAT Hyderabad ruled that the appellant is not liable for service tax on the construction of residential flats for the period before July 1, 2010, based on Circular No.151/2/2010-ST. For the period after July 1, 2010, the Tribunal determined that the service tax was incorrectly demanded under "Construction of residential complex service" and should have been classified under "Works Contract service." The Tribunal allowed the appeal, set aside the Impugned Order, and granted the appellant consequential benefits according to the law. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 29 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447066