<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (12) TMI 750 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447066</link>
    <description>Service tax on construction of residential flats was not chargeable for the period before 1 July 2010, in view of the Board circular. For the period after that date, the activity was taxable, where applicable, as works contract service under section 65(105)(zzzza) of the Finance Act, 1994, and not under construction of residential complex service. The demand was therefore unsustainable under the wrong head of tax classification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2023 09:06:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=735507" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (12) TMI 750 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447066</link>
      <description>Service tax on construction of residential flats was not chargeable for the period before 1 July 2010, in view of the Board circular. For the period after that date, the activity was taxable, where applicable, as works contract service under section 65(105)(zzzza) of the Finance Act, 1994, and not under construction of residential complex service. The demand was therefore unsustainable under the wrong head of tax classification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447066</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>