<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (12) TMI 748 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447064</link>
    <description>CESTAT NEW DELHI held that notice pay recovered from employees upon premature termination of employment is not taxable under service tax. The Tribunal ruled that compensation for contract failure does not constitute consideration for services, following precedent from Rajasthan Rajya Vidhyut Prasaran Nigam Ltd. case and Madras HC decision. Notice pay does not involve service rendition by either employer or employee. The demand for service tax on notice pay recovered by appellant from employees was set aside and appeal allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2023 20:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=735504" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (12) TMI 748 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447064</link>
      <description>CESTAT NEW DELHI held that notice pay recovered from employees upon premature termination of employment is not taxable under service tax. The Tribunal ruled that compensation for contract failure does not constitute consideration for services, following precedent from Rajasthan Rajya Vidhyut Prasaran Nigam Ltd. case and Madras HC decision. Notice pay does not involve service rendition by either employer or employee. The demand for service tax on notice pay recovered by appellant from employees was set aside and appeal allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447064</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>