<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (12) TMI 741 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447057</link>
    <description>A civil dispute arising from a conveyance deed and development agreements was held arbitrable under the broad arbitration clause in earlier tripartite agreements, because the later instruments derived their source from those agreements. At the referral stage after the 2015 amendment, the court&#039;s scrutiny is confined to the existence of a valid arbitration agreement and whether the dispute is manifestly non-arbitrable. A challenge to cancellation or declaration of rights over an immovable property document was treated as an action in personam, and the fraud allegation was not shown to exclude arbitration. Questions on the existence and validity of the clause could be determined by the arbitral tribunal under kompetenz-kompetenz.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2023 09:05:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=735495" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (12) TMI 741 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447057</link>
      <description>A civil dispute arising from a conveyance deed and development agreements was held arbitrable under the broad arbitration clause in earlier tripartite agreements, because the later instruments derived their source from those agreements. At the referral stage after the 2015 amendment, the court&#039;s scrutiny is confined to the existence of a valid arbitration agreement and whether the dispute is manifestly non-arbitrable. A challenge to cancellation or declaration of rights over an immovable property document was treated as an action in personam, and the fraud allegation was not shown to exclude arbitration. Questions on the existence and validity of the clause could be determined by the arbitral tribunal under kompetenz-kompetenz.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447057</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>