https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311289 CIDCO was treated as a new town development authority and special planning authority under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, with its provident fund constituted for officers and employees and governed as a Government Provident Fund. In that statutory setting, the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 remained subject to Section 16, and establishments belonging to or under the control of the Central or State Government were exempt where employees were already covered by a government provident fund or pension scheme. On that basis, CIDCO fell within the exemption and EPF authorities had no authority to proceed against it under the Act. en-us Thu, 04 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 17 Dec 2023 15:13:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311289 CIDCO was treated as a new town development authority and special planning authority under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, with its provident fund constituted for officers and employees and governed as a Government Provident Fund. In that statutory setting, the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 remained subject to Section 16, and establishments belonging to or under the control of the Central or State Government were exempt where employees were already covered by a government provident fund or pension scheme. On that basis, CIDCO fell within the exemption and EPF authorities had no authority to proceed against it under the Act. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 04 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311289