<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 156 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34939</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the appeals, canceling the Tribunal and Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) orders due to contradictory findings in separate appeals involving the managing partner. The case was remanded for further assessment on the merits, emphasizing the importance of correct jurisdictional aspects in Income-tax Act assessments for fair tax liability determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73549" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 156 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34939</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the appeals, canceling the Tribunal and Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) orders due to contradictory findings in separate appeals involving the managing partner. The case was remanded for further assessment on the merits, emphasizing the importance of correct jurisdictional aspects in Income-tax Act assessments for fair tax liability determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34939</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>