<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (12) TMI 739 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447055</link>
    <description>Article 136 discretionary jurisdiction permits the Supreme Court to decline interference in Special Leave Petitions after considering the factual matrix and the limited extent of the demand. Delay in filing was condoned, allowing the petitions to be considered on merits; however, the Court declined to grant further relief and dismissed the petitions because the demand was comparatively low and the circumstances did not warrant intervention.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2026 11:48:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=735483" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (12) TMI 739 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447055</link>
      <description>Article 136 discretionary jurisdiction permits the Supreme Court to decline interference in Special Leave Petitions after considering the factual matrix and the limited extent of the demand. Delay in filing was condoned, allowing the petitions to be considered on merits; however, the Court declined to grant further relief and dismissed the petitions because the demand was comparatively low and the circumstances did not warrant intervention.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447055</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>