<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (10) TMI 718 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311279</link>
    <description>The HC upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the disallowance of selling expenses claimed by the Assessee under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal had determined that the issue was debatable, thus making Section 154 inapplicable since it permits only rectification of clear errors, not a review. The HC agreed that the Assessing Officer&#039;s action exceeded the permissible scope of rectification, affirming that no substantial question of law was involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2023 13:18:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=735449" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (10) TMI 718 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311279</link>
      <description>The HC upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the disallowance of selling expenses claimed by the Assessee under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal had determined that the issue was debatable, thus making Section 154 inapplicable since it permits only rectification of clear errors, not a review. The HC agreed that the Assessing Officer&#039;s action exceeded the permissible scope of rectification, affirming that no substantial question of law was involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311279</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>