<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1592 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311276</link>
    <description>Delay was condoned, and the Supreme Court found no reason to interfere with the impugned order, so the special leave petition was dismissed. Pending applications, if any, were also disposed of. The text records only this procedural outcome and does not set out any substantive legal principle beyond the Court&#039;s decision not to interfere.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2023 10:01:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=735439" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1592 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311276</link>
      <description>Delay was condoned, and the Supreme Court found no reason to interfere with the impugned order, so the special leave petition was dismissed. Pending applications, if any, were also disposed of. The text records only this procedural outcome and does not set out any substantive legal principle beyond the Court&#039;s decision not to interfere.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311276</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>