<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (12) TMI 725 - APPELLATE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, GUJARAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447041</link>
    <description>The AAAR Gujarat rejected the appeal of a company incorporated under the Companies Act claiming to be a local authority. The appellant, formed as a Special Purpose Vehicle and funded through Central funds via AMC, argued for local authority status to avoid GST registration as a deductor. The AAAR held that despite receiving Central funding, the appellant was not in control/management of municipal/local funds and lacked statutory authority under the GPMC Act unlike AMTS. The appellant was neither a Municipal Committee, Zilla Parishad, District Board, nor other legally entitled authority for municipal fund management, therefore not qualifying as a local authority and not required to register as GST deductor.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2025 18:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=735416" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (12) TMI 725 - APPELLATE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, GUJARAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447041</link>
      <description>The AAAR Gujarat rejected the appeal of a company incorporated under the Companies Act claiming to be a local authority. The appellant, formed as a Special Purpose Vehicle and funded through Central funds via AMC, argued for local authority status to avoid GST registration as a deductor. The AAAR held that despite receiving Central funding, the appellant was not in control/management of municipal/local funds and lacked statutory authority under the GPMC Act unlike AMTS. The appellant was neither a Municipal Committee, Zilla Parishad, District Board, nor other legally entitled authority for municipal fund management, therefore not qualifying as a local authority and not required to register as GST deductor.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447041</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>