<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (12) TMI 696 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447012</link>
    <description>The policy scheme for EOU units required fixation of wastage norms for products not covered by notified norms, and the Development Commissioner&#039;s power was limited to ad hoc norms for a restricted period. The Norms Committee could not decline to fix norms merely because it considered the petitioner&#039;s downstream marble products commercially unviable or likely to generate high wastage, since commercial viability was a matter for the entrepreneur and permission under the EOU scheme was a policy question for the competent Government. The report was also vitiated by reliance on the Excise Department&#039;s input despite earlier directions that the matter proceed without such objections. The refusal was unsustainable, and the report was liable to be set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2023 15:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=735386" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (12) TMI 696 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447012</link>
      <description>The policy scheme for EOU units required fixation of wastage norms for products not covered by notified norms, and the Development Commissioner&#039;s power was limited to ad hoc norms for a restricted period. The Norms Committee could not decline to fix norms merely because it considered the petitioner&#039;s downstream marble products commercially unviable or likely to generate high wastage, since commercial viability was a matter for the entrepreneur and permission under the EOU scheme was a policy question for the competent Government. The report was also vitiated by reliance on the Excise Department&#039;s input despite earlier directions that the matter proceed without such objections. The refusal was unsustainable, and the report was liable to be set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=447012</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>