<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 73 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34926</link>
    <description>CESTAT, MUMBAI - AT dismissed the appeals, holding the appellant not entitled to CENVAT credit on four services (association subscription, security at railway siding, rent-a-cab and mobile telephony). The tribunal found the appellant failed to establish the requisite nexus or that the services were dedicated to manufacture/clearance of final products; mobile use was held potentially multifarious and not demonstrated as exclusively for manufacturing/clearance. Having decided the substantive issue against the appellant, the tribunal did not consider the limitation plea.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2025 15:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73536" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 73 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34926</link>
      <description>CESTAT, MUMBAI - AT dismissed the appeals, holding the appellant not entitled to CENVAT credit on four services (association subscription, security at railway siding, rent-a-cab and mobile telephony). The tribunal found the appellant failed to establish the requisite nexus or that the services were dedicated to manufacture/clearance of final products; mobile use was held potentially multifarious and not demonstrated as exclusively for manufacturing/clearance. Having decided the substantive issue against the appellant, the tribunal did not consider the limitation plea.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34926</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>