<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (12) TMI 666 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446982</link>
    <description>HC found a violation of natural justice in a CGST Act proceeding. The order under Section 73 was quashed due to lack of personal hearing and failure to provide crucial parameters 70 and 73 to the petitioner. The court directed respondents to furnish detailed parameters, allow petitioner&#039;s personal hearing, and pass a fresh order in accordance with legal principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2025 17:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=735287" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (12) TMI 666 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446982</link>
      <description>HC found a violation of natural justice in a CGST Act proceeding. The order under Section 73 was quashed due to lack of personal hearing and failure to provide crucial parameters 70 and 73 to the petitioner. The court directed respondents to furnish detailed parameters, allow petitioner&#039;s personal hearing, and pass a fresh order in accordance with legal principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446982</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>