<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (12) TMI 661 - APPELLATE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, GUJARAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446977</link>
    <description>A turnkey contract for supply, erection, installation and commissioning of a cattle feed plant was treated as works contract service because the installed plant resulted in immovable property. The determining factor was the permanent attachment and functional integration of interlinked machinery, structures, electrical systems, piping, foundations, grouting and commissioning activities into a single operational unit that could not be shifted without dismantling and re-erection. On those facts, the contract fell within the GST definition of works contract for immovable property, and the composite supply was held taxable as works contract service at the applicable rate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2025 18:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=735282" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (12) TMI 661 - APPELLATE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, GUJARAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446977</link>
      <description>A turnkey contract for supply, erection, installation and commissioning of a cattle feed plant was treated as works contract service because the installed plant resulted in immovable property. The determining factor was the permanent attachment and functional integration of interlinked machinery, structures, electrical systems, piping, foundations, grouting and commissioning activities into a single operational unit that could not be shifted without dismantling and re-erection. On those facts, the contract fell within the GST definition of works contract for immovable property, and the composite supply was held taxable as works contract service at the applicable rate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446977</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>