<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (12) TMI 609 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI - LB</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446925</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision to dismiss the Section 9 petition under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, due to a pre-existing dispute between the parties regarding the lifting of materials. The Tribunal agreed with the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s reliance on the Apex Court&#039;s judgment in Mobilox Innovations Private Limited vs. Kirusa Software Private Limited, confirming that the dispute was plausible and warranted further investigation. The appeal was dismissed, and no jurisdictional overreach or error was found in the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2023 10:52:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=735230" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (12) TMI 609 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI - LB</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446925</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision to dismiss the Section 9 petition under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, due to a pre-existing dispute between the parties regarding the lifting of materials. The Tribunal agreed with the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s reliance on the Apex Court&#039;s judgment in Mobilox Innovations Private Limited vs. Kirusa Software Private Limited, confirming that the dispute was plausible and warranted further investigation. The appeal was dismissed, and no jurisdictional overreach or error was found in the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=446925</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>