https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311238 The SC determined that the Resolution Professional should have maintained neutrality and not filed appeals. It ruled that the aggrieved parties, such as the Committee of Creditors for RPPL and RISPL, have the prerogative to initiate actions or appeals. Consequently, the appeals filed by the Resolution Professional were dismissed. The Court noted it could seek assistance from the Resolution Professional if an appeal is lodged by the Committee of Creditors or another party. Pending applications were ordered to be disposed of accordingly. en-us Mon, 25 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Dec 2023 08:28:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311238 The SC determined that the Resolution Professional should have maintained neutrality and not filed appeals. It ruled that the aggrieved parties, such as the Committee of Creditors for RPPL and RISPL, have the prerogative to initiate actions or appeals. Consequently, the appeals filed by the Resolution Professional were dismissed. The Court noted it could seek assistance from the Resolution Professional if an appeal is lodged by the Committee of Creditors or another party. Pending applications were ordered to be disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 25 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311238