https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311235 A genuine settlement that has been acted upon may justify quashing criminal proceedings under the inherent powers of the HC, even where the offence is non-compoundable, because continued prosecution would be inconsistent with the compromise already reached. For proceedings under Section 319 CrPC, the term "evidence" was treated broadly to include statements and admissions recorded in court about receipt of the settlement amount and execution of the compromise, even if the compromise deed was not formally exhibited. On that basis, the summoning orders were held unsustainable and the revisional order was set aside. en-us Fri, 26 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Dec 2023 08:28:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311235 A genuine settlement that has been acted upon may justify quashing criminal proceedings under the inherent powers of the HC, even where the offence is non-compoundable, because continued prosecution would be inconsistent with the compromise already reached. For proceedings under Section 319 CrPC, the term "evidence" was treated broadly to include statements and admissions recorded in court about receipt of the settlement amount and execution of the compromise, even if the compromise deed was not formally exhibited. On that basis, the summoning orders were held unsustainable and the revisional order was set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 26 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311235