https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311229 Trustworthy eyewitness and injured-witness testimony, supported by corroboration, sustained the findings of guilt; minor contradictions and delay did not discredit the prosecution case, and the convictions were upheld. Liability under Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 was affirmed on proof of participation in an unlawful assembly and its common object, even without a specific overt act attributed to each accused. Concurrent findings of fact ordinarily do not warrant interference under Article 136 of the Constitution of India absent perversity or grave error, and the appeals were dismissed. en-us Thu, 23 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 08 Jan 2024 16:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311229 Trustworthy eyewitness and injured-witness testimony, supported by corroboration, sustained the findings of guilt; minor contradictions and delay did not discredit the prosecution case, and the convictions were upheld. Liability under Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 was affirmed on proof of participation in an unlawful assembly and its common object, even without a specific overt act attributed to each accused. Concurrent findings of fact ordinarily do not warrant interference under Article 136 of the Constitution of India absent perversity or grave error, and the appeals were dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 23 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311229