https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311227 An administrative enquiry into allegedly manipulated land-ceiling records and bogus sub-leases was upheld as a valid step to verify the accuracy of revenue entries, and as supportable under executive power within the State's legislative field. A challenge based on limitation and finality failed because an order alleged to have been procured by fraud is treated as a nullity and is not protected by prior conclusiveness if fraud is established. The absence of prior notice and alleged constitutional violations also did not invalidate the order, since it was only a preliminary enquiry with no immediate deprivation of property. en-us Wed, 11 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Dec 2023 08:28:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311227 An administrative enquiry into allegedly manipulated land-ceiling records and bogus sub-leases was upheld as a valid step to verify the accuracy of revenue entries, and as supportable under executive power within the State's legislative field. A challenge based on limitation and finality failed because an order alleged to have been procured by fraud is treated as a nullity and is not protected by prior conclusiveness if fraud is established. The absence of prior notice and alleged constitutional violations also did not invalidate the order, since it was only a preliminary enquiry with no immediate deprivation of property. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 11 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311227