https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311218 The petition was entertained because the tribunal had not yet been constituted, allowing interim judicial consideration at this stage. The Court required the petitioner to deposit 30% of the disputed tax amount within the stipulated period in line with the statutory pre-deposit requirement, and stayed recovery of the remaining tax, penalty and fine during pendency of the petition. The matter therefore remained pending with conditional interim protection tied to compliance with the deposit direction. en-us Tue, 19 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Dec 2023 08:28:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311218 The petition was entertained because the tribunal had not yet been constituted, allowing interim judicial consideration at this stage. The Court required the petitioner to deposit 30% of the disputed tax amount within the stipulated period in line with the statutory pre-deposit requirement, and stayed recovery of the remaining tax, penalty and fine during pendency of the petition. The matter therefore remained pending with conditional interim protection tied to compliance with the deposit direction. Case-Laws GST Tue, 19 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311218