https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311215 Under the U.P. GST Act, the petitioner was allowed to make the additional pre-deposit required for a second appeal where the Appellate Tribunal had not yet been constituted. Since 10% of the disputed tax demand had already been deposited at the first appeal stage, the Court permitted deposit of 20% of the remaining disputed amount to maintain the second appeal. On such deposit, recovery of the balance demand would remain stayed in accordance with the statutory scheme. en-us Thu, 19 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Dec 2023 08:28:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311215 Under the U.P. GST Act, the petitioner was allowed to make the additional pre-deposit required for a second appeal where the Appellate Tribunal had not yet been constituted. Since 10% of the disputed tax demand had already been deposited at the first appeal stage, the Court permitted deposit of 20% of the remaining disputed amount to maintain the second appeal. On such deposit, recovery of the balance demand would remain stayed in accordance with the statutory scheme. Case-Laws GST Thu, 19 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311215