https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311214 The HC, comprising Justices M.M. Sundresh and RMT. Teekaa Raman, addressed a challenge to a provisional attachment order by the Adjudicating Authority. The Court ruled that since the original proceedings were still pending, it was inappropriate to invoke Article 226. The Court directed the Adjudicating Authority to complete the proceedings within two months, ensuring all relevant materials are considered. The Criminal Original Petitions and Writ Petitions were disposed of with these directions, and no costs were awarded. Connected miscellaneous petitions were also closed. en-us Wed, 23 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Dec 2023 08:28:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311214 The HC, comprising Justices M.M. Sundresh and RMT. Teekaa Raman, addressed a challenge to a provisional attachment order by the Adjudicating Authority. The Court ruled that since the original proceedings were still pending, it was inappropriate to invoke Article 226. The Court directed the Adjudicating Authority to complete the proceedings within two months, ensuring all relevant materials are considered. The Criminal Original Petitions and Writ Petitions were disposed of with these directions, and no costs were awarded. Connected miscellaneous petitions were also closed. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 23 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311214