<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1936 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311213</link>
    <description>Where a loan dispute has been fully settled and the bank has accepted the settlement amount without objection, continuation of criminal proceedings may be treated as unfair, contrary to the interests of justice, or an abuse of process. Applying this settlement-based quashing principle, the FIR and related proceedings were quashed against the petitioners to the extent of their alleged role in the offence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2023 08:28:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=735023" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1936 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311213</link>
      <description>Where a loan dispute has been fully settled and the bank has accepted the settlement amount without objection, continuation of criminal proceedings may be treated as unfair, contrary to the interests of justice, or an abuse of process. Applying this settlement-based quashing principle, the FIR and related proceedings were quashed against the petitioners to the extent of their alleged role in the offence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311213</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>