https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311202 A public authority that executed the lease and confirmation deed, accepted premium and transfer charges, and allowed development to proceed could not later unilaterally cancel the allotment after the allottee altered its position. The absence of a public auction did not by itself invalidate the allotment because the governing regulations also permitted disposal by individual application. The authority's attempt to characterise its own prior action as void or opposed to public policy was rejected, and the cancellation and show cause notice were held unsustainable and quashed. en-us Thu, 08 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 08 Jan 2024 16:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311202 A public authority that executed the lease and confirmation deed, accepted premium and transfer charges, and allowed development to proceed could not later unilaterally cancel the allotment after the allottee altered its position. The absence of a public auction did not by itself invalidate the allotment because the governing regulations also permitted disposal by individual application. The authority's attempt to characterise its own prior action as void or opposed to public policy was rejected, and the cancellation and show cause notice were held unsustainable and quashed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 08 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311202