https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311201 Creation and continuance of a district was treated as a policy matter within the executive sphere. The Court stated that judicial review in such cases is narrow and does not permit substitution of the court's view for that of the Government merely because another approach is possible. Interference is justified only where a fundamental right is infringed or the policy is otherwise legally unsustainable. As the Government had considered the relevant factors and complied with the earlier reconsideration direction through a Cabinet decision, the State's policy choice was left undisturbed and the challenge failed. en-us Mon, 10 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Dec 2023 17:07:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311201 Creation and continuance of a district was treated as a policy matter within the executive sphere. The Court stated that judicial review in such cases is narrow and does not permit substitution of the court's view for that of the Government merely because another approach is possible. Interference is justified only where a fundamental right is infringed or the policy is otherwise legally unsustainable. As the Government had considered the relevant factors and complied with the earlier reconsideration direction through a Cabinet decision, the State's policy choice was left undisturbed and the challenge failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 10 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311201