<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 1409 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311194</link>
    <description>Section 482 Cr.P.C. jurisdiction is equitable and requires full, candid disclosure of all material facts. Suppression of earlier orders and repeated attempts to secure relief contrary to prior judicial directions amount to abuse of process; a litigant who approaches the court with unclean hands is not entitled to indulgence. The application was therefore liable to be rejected because material facts were concealed and the process of law was misused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2023 07:23:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=734915" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 1409 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311194</link>
      <description>Section 482 Cr.P.C. jurisdiction is equitable and requires full, candid disclosure of all material facts. Suppression of earlier orders and repeated attempts to secure relief contrary to prior judicial directions amount to abuse of process; a litigant who approaches the court with unclean hands is not entitled to indulgence. The application was therefore liable to be rejected because material facts were concealed and the process of law was misused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311194</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>