<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (7) TMI 2006 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311186</link>
    <description>Under the Competition Act, review of a combination under Section 6(2) is confined to a prima facie assessment of whether it is likely to cause an appreciable adverse effect on competition; if no such concern emerges, approval under Section 31 follows and the Section 29 process is unnecessary. Third-party objections are relevant only where the Commission forms a prima facie adverse view. Allegations of undisclosed relevant markets or abuse of dominant position cannot be examined at the approval stage because they belong to a separate Section 4 inquiry. The communication was not an appealable order under Section 53A, so the appeal was not maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2023 20:02:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=734907" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (7) TMI 2006 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311186</link>
      <description>Under the Competition Act, review of a combination under Section 6(2) is confined to a prima facie assessment of whether it is likely to cause an appreciable adverse effect on competition; if no such concern emerges, approval under Section 31 follows and the Section 29 process is unnecessary. Third-party objections are relevant only where the Commission forms a prima facie adverse view. Allegations of undisclosed relevant markets or abuse of dominant position cannot be examined at the approval stage because they belong to a separate Section 4 inquiry. The communication was not an appealable order under Section 53A, so the appeal was not maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Law of Competition</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311186</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>