<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 1393 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311183</link>
    <description>ITAT Ahmedabad dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging reopening of assessment beyond four years for FBT provision and Social Forestry expenditure additions. The tribunal found no failure by assessee to disclose material facts as FBT provision was in P&amp;amp;L account during original assessment and Social Forestry expenditure was properly disclosed. Regarding MAT credit entitlement adjustment while computing book profit under Section 115JB, ITAT deleted the addition, finding no logic in the adjustment since provision for current tax and MAT credit were shown separately per accounting principles. On foreign exchange fluctuation loss on working capital, the matter was restored to AO for fresh examination with proper verification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2023 20:02:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=734904" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 1393 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311183</link>
      <description>ITAT Ahmedabad dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging reopening of assessment beyond four years for FBT provision and Social Forestry expenditure additions. The tribunal found no failure by assessee to disclose material facts as FBT provision was in P&amp;amp;L account during original assessment and Social Forestry expenditure was properly disclosed. Regarding MAT credit entitlement adjustment while computing book profit under Section 115JB, ITAT deleted the addition, finding no logic in the adjustment since provision for current tax and MAT credit were shown separately per accounting principles. On foreign exchange fluctuation loss on working capital, the matter was restored to AO for fresh examination with proper verification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311183</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>