<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 224 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34872</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the respondent, allowing the refund claim due to the non-dutiable nature of the goods and the absence of unjust enrichment. The decision was based on the sequence of events regarding duty payment and subsequent legal determinations, leading to the rejection of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73485" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 224 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34872</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the respondent, allowing the refund claim due to the non-dutiable nature of the goods and the absence of unjust enrichment. The decision was based on the sequence of events regarding duty payment and subsequent legal determinations, leading to the rejection of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34872</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>