<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (10) TMI 43 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34869</link>
    <description>A show cause notice under Section 11A of the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944 could not be issued before assessment was finally completed, because the provision operated only after short-levy or short-payment was crystallised by final assessment. The order dated 10.04.1986 was not a final assessment order since it only set out valuation principles, while the later order dated 28.04.1988 finalised the provisional assessments and determined the differential duty. Rule 9B(5) of the Central Excise Rules, 1984 reinforced that provisional assessments acquire finality only on adjustment against the duty finally assessed. The ratio of Serai Kella Glass Works Pvt. Ltd. therefore supported the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 14:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73482" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (10) TMI 43 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34869</link>
      <description>A show cause notice under Section 11A of the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944 could not be issued before assessment was finally completed, because the provision operated only after short-levy or short-payment was crystallised by final assessment. The order dated 10.04.1986 was not a final assessment order since it only set out valuation principles, while the later order dated 28.04.1988 finalised the provisional assessments and determined the differential duty. Rule 9B(5) of the Central Excise Rules, 1984 reinforced that provisional assessments acquire finality only on adjustment against the duty finally assessed. The ratio of Serai Kella Glass Works Pvt. Ltd. therefore supported the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34869</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>