<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 1226 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311179</link>
    <description>A signed cheque voluntarily handed over by the drawer attracts the statutory presumptions under the Negotiable Instruments Act, and the presumption of liability remains unless the accused produces reliable evidence of repayment or of a different issuance date. A cheque described as blank, later filled by the payee, or issued as security does not by itself defeat liability where the underlying debt subsists. The appellate court&#039;s finding of material alteration was unsupported by evidence and treated as perverse. In revision, however, the High Court could not directly convert the acquittal into a conviction because of the bar under Section 401(3) CrPC, so the matter was remitted for fresh disposal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2023 19:45:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=734759" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 1226 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311179</link>
      <description>A signed cheque voluntarily handed over by the drawer attracts the statutory presumptions under the Negotiable Instruments Act, and the presumption of liability remains unless the accused produces reliable evidence of repayment or of a different issuance date. A cheque described as blank, later filled by the payee, or issued as security does not by itself defeat liability where the underlying debt subsists. The appellate court&#039;s finding of material alteration was unsupported by evidence and treated as perverse. In revision, however, the High Court could not directly convert the acquittal into a conviction because of the bar under Section 401(3) CrPC, so the matter was remitted for fresh disposal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311179</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>