https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311170 The grant of probate was upheld because the Will was duly proved and no suspicious circumstances surrounded its execution. The alleged exclusion of the testator's spouse and the other co-testator's husband did not, by itself, make the disposition unnatural. The Court noted that the co-testator was in a sound disposing state of mind when executing the Will and that no contemporaneous grievance had been raised by the husband. On that evidentiary basis, the probate courts were right to accept the Will and reject the challenge. en-us Wed, 26 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 Dec 2023 17:44:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311170 The grant of probate was upheld because the Will was duly proved and no suspicious circumstances surrounded its execution. The alleged exclusion of the testator's spouse and the other co-testator's husband did not, by itself, make the disposition unnatural. The Court noted that the co-testator was in a sound disposing state of mind when executing the Will and that no contemporaneous grievance had been raised by the husband. On that evidentiary basis, the probate courts were right to accept the Will and reject the challenge. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 26 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311170