<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1973 (3) TMI 152 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311169</link>
    <description>The HC reconstituted the Board of Directors of Bennett Coleman &amp; Co. Ltd. to include eleven directors, with appointments from shareholders, the Central Government, and the Court, for a term of seven years. The Court dismissed an application to record a compromise, citing lack of a complete agreement and public interest concerns. The reconstitution, challenged under Sections 255 and 408 of the Companies Act, was upheld, with the Court exercising its broad powers under Sections 397, 398, and 402. Injunctions against certain individuals were issued due to allegations of mismanagement. Appeals against these decisions were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2023 16:54:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=734737" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1973 (3) TMI 152 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311169</link>
      <description>The HC reconstituted the Board of Directors of Bennett Coleman &amp; Co. Ltd. to include eleven directors, with appointments from shareholders, the Central Government, and the Court, for a term of seven years. The Court dismissed an application to record a compromise, citing lack of a complete agreement and public interest concerns. The reconstitution, challenged under Sections 255 and 408 of the Companies Act, was upheld, with the Court exercising its broad powers under Sections 397, 398, and 402. Injunctions against certain individuals were issued due to allegations of mismanagement. Appeals against these decisions were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311169</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>