<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (3) TMI 675 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311166</link>
    <description>A summoning order passed in a revision arising from a police-report case is not treated as merely interlocutory, so it remains open to revisional scrutiny under Section 397 CrPC. At the stage of issuing process under Section 204 CrPC, the Magistrate need only find sufficient ground for proceeding; a detailed merits-based evaluation of evidence or elaborate reasons is not required. The distinction from dismissal of a complaint under Section 203 and the later charge stages under Sections 239 and 240 was reaffirmed. The challenge to the summoning order therefore failed, and issuance of process on the police report was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2023 16:09:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=734731" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (3) TMI 675 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311166</link>
      <description>A summoning order passed in a revision arising from a police-report case is not treated as merely interlocutory, so it remains open to revisional scrutiny under Section 397 CrPC. At the stage of issuing process under Section 204 CrPC, the Magistrate need only find sufficient ground for proceeding; a detailed merits-based evaluation of evidence or elaborate reasons is not required. The distinction from dismissal of a complaint under Section 203 and the later charge stages under Sections 239 and 240 was reaffirmed. The challenge to the summoning order therefore failed, and issuance of process on the police report was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311166</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>