<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1924 (7) TMI 6 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311164</link>
    <description>Shareholder notice requirements are satisfied where the general nature of the business and sufficient particulars for informed consideration are disclosed; undisclosed director benefits must be proved, detailed valuation calculations need not be circulated, and an agreement may be made available for inspection. A statutory amalgamation scheme may be approved through a special resolution without separate memorandum authority, including where winding-up matters are addressed concurrently. Meeting objections require a proper point of order, a permissible amendment, and timely, specific challenges to votes. A confirmatory meeting may validate the resolution, while changes in proposed liquidators do not affect validity where corporate authority supports the final agreement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 1924 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2023 15:36:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=734726" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1924 (7) TMI 6 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311164</link>
      <description>Shareholder notice requirements are satisfied where the general nature of the business and sufficient particulars for informed consideration are disclosed; undisclosed director benefits must be proved, detailed valuation calculations need not be circulated, and an agreement may be made available for inspection. A statutory amalgamation scheme may be approved through a special resolution without separate memorandum authority, including where winding-up matters are addressed concurrently. Meeting objections require a proper point of order, a permissible amendment, and timely, specific challenges to votes. A confirmatory meeting may validate the resolution, while changes in proposed liquidators do not affect validity where corporate authority supports the final agreement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 1924 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311164</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>