https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311160 Section 33-B(1)(a)(i) allowed regularisation only where an appointee against a short-term vacancy, later converted into a substantive vacancy, had been continuously serving under the statutory removal of difficulties scheme. Here, the teacher's service had already been terminated, and his later continuation was only under an interim stay order, not under any subsisting right of appointment. Because the regularisation order was expressly subject to the writ proceedings and the statutory requirement of continuous service was not met, the benefit of regularisation was unavailable. The order of regularisation could not stand, and the challenge to termination succeeded. en-us Mon, 31 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 23 Jan 2024 15:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311160 Section 33-B(1)(a)(i) allowed regularisation only where an appointee against a short-term vacancy, later converted into a substantive vacancy, had been continuously serving under the statutory removal of difficulties scheme. Here, the teacher's service had already been terminated, and his later continuation was only under an interim stay order, not under any subsisting right of appointment. Because the regularisation order was expressly subject to the writ proceedings and the statutory requirement of continuous service was not met, the benefit of regularisation was unavailable. The order of regularisation could not stand, and the challenge to termination succeeded. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 31 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311160