<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Warehouse Fire Sparks Debate Over Insurance, Customs Duty Reimbursement, and Unjust Enrichment Claims.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=73513</link>
    <description>Warehouse insured or not - fire incident - Loss of customs duty - Reimbursement of Customs Duty and unjust enrichment - To avoid any confusion, the customs duty component of the claim should, in the given event, be discharged directly to the Customs Department. All other legal consequences will follow on upholding the claim of the insured against the appellants - SC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2023 12:14:50 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2023 12:14:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=734693" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Warehouse Fire Sparks Debate Over Insurance, Customs Duty Reimbursement, and Unjust Enrichment Claims.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=73513</link>
      <description>Warehouse insured or not - fire incident - Loss of customs duty - Reimbursement of Customs Duty and unjust enrichment - To avoid any confusion, the customs duty component of the claim should, in the given event, be discharged directly to the Customs Department. All other legal consequences will follow on upholding the claim of the insured against the appellants - SC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2023 12:14:50 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=73513</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>