https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311151 A judicial officer cannot be subjected to disciplinary punishment merely because judicial orders are later found to be wrong or based on an imperfect appreciation of facts. Pension withdrawal under the Bihar Pension Rules was unsustainable because the record disclosed no collateral material showing extraneous considerations, corrupt motive, or other conduct unbecoming of a judicial officer. Article 235 confers supervisory control over the subordinate judiciary, but that control must be exercised cautiously and cannot be used to punish a judge solely for erroneous orders. The punitive order withdrawing the entire pension was therefore set aside. en-us Mon, 13 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 Dec 2023 09:00:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311151 A judicial officer cannot be subjected to disciplinary punishment merely because judicial orders are later found to be wrong or based on an imperfect appreciation of facts. Pension withdrawal under the Bihar Pension Rules was unsustainable because the record disclosed no collateral material showing extraneous considerations, corrupt motive, or other conduct unbecoming of a judicial officer. Article 235 confers supervisory control over the subordinate judiciary, but that control must be exercised cautiously and cannot be used to punish a judge solely for erroneous orders. The punitive order withdrawing the entire pension was therefore set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 13 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=311151